Constraints-Driven Design

Define clear constraints so teams build consistent solutions without stifling flexibility.

Design Systems
Architecture

When I design a design system, I treat constraints as a design tool, not as a limitation to work around.

Explicit constraints reduce ambiguity, guide decision-making, and prevent the gradual erosion of the system.

In the absence of clearly defined constraints, teams tend to:

  • improvise solutions,
  • stretch components beyond their intended purpose,
  • and introduce inconsistencies that are difficult to detect and even harder to remove.

A constraints-driven system makes boundaries visible.

It defines not only what is possible, but also what is intentionally unsupported, allowing teams to move faster and with greater confidence.

  • Constraints are most effective when they are:
  • explicit,
  • documented,
  • and enforced by the system itself.

Limited and intentional component APIs

Components were designed with intentionally constrained APIs to prevent misuse and uncontrolled variation.

Expose only properties that support known and validated use cases. Add configuration options to solve isolated problems. Treat every new prop as a design decision with long-term impact. Turn components into generic containers with unlimited flexibility.
A list of tools and services related to this argument. Documentation tools Curated component APIs Robust API design it may be outdated

Design tokens as enforced boundaries

Design tokens were used to encode visual constraints directly into the system.

Use tokens to control spacing, color, typography, and motion. Allow arbitrary values outside the token set. Make tokens the only supported way to express system values. Treat tokens as optional or decorative abstractions.
A list of tools and services related to this argument. Tokens documentation Tokens tools it may be outdated

Composition rules instead of free assembly

Composable components were governed by explicit composition rules.